Don't wanna be killjoy, but specifically since "sleek" and "native" is mentioned many times, I'd say that's not what one expects from a sleek macOS application to say the least.
I'd expect something like Cyberduck quality UI, as an example. The author should aim to mimic system UI in my opinion as closely as possible (or integrate inside Finder).
Don't wanna be killjoy, but specifically since "sleek" and "native" is mentioned many times, I'd say that's not what one expects from a sleek macOS application to say the least.
I'd expect something like Cyberduck quality UI, as an example. The author should aim to mimic system UI in my opinion as closely as possible (or integrate inside Finder).
> Important: Right-click the app and select "Open" (required for unsigned apps) Click "Open" in the security dialog that appears
Nope. Sign up for an Apple Developer account, then sign, notarize and staple it. You can notarize the dmg or a zip of the app bundle.
Consider using Sparkle to distribute updates.
Agree with other comment that the UI also doesn't look anything like a native app.
Looks vibe coded?
Ugh. This term can't die fast enough.
The CLAUDE.md file is right there, so they are probably using agentic coding.
But why does it matter? Does the app not work? I don't have a Mac, can't check.
Of course it is.
As usual, it is low quality and has zero tests.
agents should agentically create high quality unit tests
Why do you say that?
Because it is true. Claude did almost all of it.