As ever, the misbegotten apex species of our planet is fully prepared to sacrifice the actually real, mostly irreplaceable existence of the natural world for the societal construct of wealth. We've inherited a beautiful home with unthinkably-beautiful custom craftsmanship, but wouldn't such a home make for wonderful firewood?
Undermining the claims of giving control back to individual states is of course the real truth of the matter, which will eventually bite the conservationist groups currently supporting this move in the ass:
> Mr. Trump has made oil and gas production a centerpiece of his presidency and sought to strip away environmental regulations that impede development.
As ever, the misbegotten apex species of our planet is fully prepared to sacrifice the actually real, mostly irreplaceable existence of the natural world for the societal construct of wealth. We've inherited a beautiful home with unthinkably-beautiful custom craftsmanship, but wouldn't such a home make for wonderful firewood?
Undermining the claims of giving control back to individual states is of course the real truth of the matter, which will eventually bite the conservationist groups currently supporting this move in the ass:
> Mr. Trump has made oil and gas production a centerpiece of his presidency and sought to strip away environmental regulations that impede development.
There are no real conservationist groups that support this.
> the conservationist groups currently supporting this move
Which ones?
The actual title of the article, as opposed to the title of the post:
Trump administration moves to roll back some protections for endangered and threatened species
---
The original title says 'some', whereas the post tile implies 'all'.