This is a good book. Also, any time this kind of book becomes available (be it a 100 year old one or a new one), it is worth looking into - great improvements in isnight and simplicity are possible above the "baseline" of US math education today.
So for example, I posit that the engineers or scientists you might admire from the 1950's didn't learn calculus or linear algebra the way you did.
I also quite liked https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/res-6-011-the-art-of-insight-in-...
Which is, I think, the successor and quite useful.
This is a good book. Also, any time this kind of book becomes available (be it a 100 year old one or a new one), it is worth looking into - great improvements in isnight and simplicity are possible above the "baseline" of US math education today.
So for example, I posit that the engineers or scientists you might admire from the 1950's didn't learn calculus or linear algebra the way you did.
Feynman learned calculus from the textbook "Calculus for the Practical Man".
Book PDF is here: https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph-pdf/2284035/book_9...
what is it about?
how to distribute fighters so that your team defeats-in-detail your opponents?
It is about useful tricks you can usually not learn in university classes.