A so-called news article that uses tweets as its primary source material is garbage and is utterly useless. They might as well be summarizing a family WhatsApp chat thread. I wish I could ban any article in my newsfeed that references tweets.
Could you help the slower ones like me understand how one of the most powerful people in the world owning, training, deploying and defending a platform that spreads CSAM is the equivalence of a arbitrary and anonymous family’s daily chatter?
Discussion yesterday (70 points, 20 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46468414
A so-called news article that uses tweets as its primary source material is garbage and is utterly useless. They might as well be summarizing a family WhatsApp chat thread. I wish I could ban any article in my newsfeed that references tweets.
Could you help the slower ones like me understand how one of the most powerful people in the world owning, training, deploying and defending a platform that spreads CSAM is the equivalence of a arbitrary and anonymous family’s daily chatter?