It doesn’t seem to be very good, but don’t worry, just keep prompting Claude and I’m sure you’ll get it sorted out.
Jokes aside, it’s cool but it’s not useful if it’s the first time I visit and I see I have 10+ past visits from all around the world… obviously this is not reliable and I wouldn’t use it for anything, much less anything serious.
Why actually try to understand a problem space? Far easier to prompt a turd into existence, polish it up with a cliché marketing page, and collect public validation from your fellow “hackers”
I’ve visited 292 times. From Melbourne, Athens, Piraeus, Paris, Munich, Vantaa, Berlin and Kuala Lumpur. I’ve used Chrome, Firefox and Safari on both mobile and desktop.
What’s even more impressive is I’ve made all of those visits from all of those cities in the last few minutes.
This helps you see how your browser tries to block or deflect fingerprint and trackers. I miss their "You are one of x,000 users" from the old site but it still gives a nice summary of bits of info your browser leaks and how fingerprinting basically works.
Apparently I went from Germany to UK in 29 minutes, pretty good.
It's a 99.5% declared confidence and says it used 30+ signals.
Assuming you've a list of VPN IP addresses, and travel times between countries, I reckon you should be able to rule out some false positives.
Would be interested to know what the "signals" were that produced the match.
I'm on domestic broadband in the UK (IPv4), according to dnschecker they're on a mainstream mobile provider in Germany. Could be a private tunnel, but those would be rare. Which raises the question of how the confidence rating is made.
I like the general page presentation, a good landing page except that you'll tend to put off everyone who gets a bad result for the example. That might be turned around with something showing "if this isn't you, well done on your browser security" and maybe some compelling stats on confirmed matches from testing?
Visited for the first time and it said I already visited 800+ times with a 99.5% accurancy - not very promising.
From the code this also looks like very simple client-side fingerprinting + IP information?
It has 99.5% confidence this is my 10th visit. I've hit refresh once, but the rest aren't me. My other "visits" are from many countries, saying I've changed browser, IP, and location. They are using the same OS and browser though.
Seeing as everyone is apparently seeing themselves having visited multiple times when it wasn't them, including me, I'm very happy with the privacy of this system =) It cannot effectively track me
It shows I've visited twice already, from different countries, IPs and browsers. I don't think this works. This open source one does work between incognito and normal session: https://fingerprintjs.github.io/fingerprintjs/
Works great, my device visited over 100 times already
edit: not only that, under past visits I can now see the ip address of other visitors, together with their rough location and browser setup. You may want to remove the "gdpr compliant" from the website :)
Don’t worry, it was 0/2 in detecting my browser or OS, like not even close, and I don’t do anything to obfuscate that, so it’s probably accidentally compliant
People in the comment section has noted the site to recognize multiple page visits from them even though this is their first time visiting the site, did you test your service yourself on different browsers / os / devices ?
It doesn’t seem to be very good, but don’t worry, just keep prompting Claude and I’m sure you’ll get it sorted out.
Jokes aside, it’s cool but it’s not useful if it’s the first time I visit and I see I have 10+ past visits from all around the world… obviously this is not reliable and I wouldn’t use it for anything, much less anything serious.
>just keep prompting Claude and I’m sure you’ll get it sorted out
Anecdotally speaking, this is the case for most new Show HNs now :^)
Why actually try to understand a problem space? Far easier to prompt a turd into existence, polish it up with a cliché marketing page, and collect public validation from your fellow “hackers”
I somehow have over 1200 visits from 8 IPs with 99.5% confidence… first time I’ve visited the page lol.
I've got 743 visits from one IP!
I somehow have over 1200 visits from 8 IPs with 99.5% confidence… first time I’ve visited the page lol.
AmIUnique.org has a good collection of non-cookie tracking techniques.
https://amiunique.org/fingerprint
I’ve visited 292 times. From Melbourne, Athens, Piraeus, Paris, Munich, Vantaa, Berlin and Kuala Lumpur. I’ve used Chrome, Firefox and Safari on both mobile and desktop.
What’s even more impressive is I’ve made all of those visits from all of those cities in the last few minutes.
You may have a bug.
It also has a 99.5% confidence that it has uniquely fingerprinted me, and says I have had 677 visits to the site, including Vietnam & Sweeden...
I think the 'unique' part of fingerprinting here isn't working unfortunately.
You've (just) between the speed of my world tour - congratulations
Unfortunately this is an example of how AI should not be used.
You have to be able to understand your core technology/IP/logic - I feel that must have been significantly overlooked here.
I love services that have not a single person as a contact/responsible for the site. /sarcasm
It's a red flag if you hide behind a contact form with no reachability beyond that whatsoever.
And as other said: 99.5% accuracy means you should have millions of working fingerprints, since mine and others are faulty as hell.
Ah, but it's "Trusted by developers and security teams worldwide!"
FYI, I'm seeing 99.5% confidence I've been to the site 62 times. I can assure you 've been there once.
I think it is called false positive :)
This reminds me of EFF's Cover Your Tracks, the rebrand of Panopticlick: https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/
This helps you see how your browser tries to block or deflect fingerprint and trackers. I miss their "You are one of x,000 users" from the old site but it still gives a nice summary of bits of info your browser leaks and how fingerprinting basically works.
Apparently I went from Germany to UK in 29 minutes, pretty good.
It's a 99.5% declared confidence and says it used 30+ signals.
Assuming you've a list of VPN IP addresses, and travel times between countries, I reckon you should be able to rule out some false positives.
Would be interested to know what the "signals" were that produced the match.
I'm on domestic broadband in the UK (IPv4), according to dnschecker they're on a mainstream mobile provider in Germany. Could be a private tunnel, but those would be rare. Which raises the question of how the confidence rating is made.
I like the general page presentation, a good landing page except that you'll tend to put off everyone who gets a bad result for the example. That might be turned around with something showing "if this isn't you, well done on your browser security" and maybe some compelling stats on confirmed matches from testing?
What differentiates this from http://fingerprint.com/?
Visited for the first time and it said I already visited 800+ times with a 99.5% accurancy - not very promising. From the code this also looks like very simple client-side fingerprinting + IP information?
The aim is great, and this would be useful for many use cases, especially when buying traffic (ads).
But as others mentioned, it is far from being accurate. I got the same as others, multiple visits from multiple countries.
It has 99.5% confidence this is my 10th visit. I've hit refresh once, but the rest aren't me. My other "visits" are from many countries, saying I've changed browser, IP, and location. They are using the same OS and browser though.
Same, it's all over the place. Whatever it is doing isn't a very strong fingerprint.
Seeing as everyone is apparently seeing themselves having visited multiple times when it wasn't them, including me, I'm very happy with the privacy of this system =) It cannot effectively track me
It shows I've visited twice already, from different countries, IPs and browsers. I don't think this works. This open source one does work between incognito and normal session: https://fingerprintjs.github.io/fingerprintjs/
Chrome, Windows 11, apparently, it saw me loads of times, but my first visit was today.
I'd love to use a reliable system like this to detect returning fake, banned, and bot users on my services.
Haha, same here, first visit but system saw me severals times already. I have a quite unique setup..
Works great! Thank you for fighting for users anonymity
Opening the site from two different temporary tab containers in Firefox yields different IDs.
Works great, my device visited over 100 times already
edit: not only that, under past visits I can now see the ip address of other visitors, together with their rough location and browser setup. You may want to remove the "gdpr compliant" from the website :)
Don’t worry, it was 0/2 in detecting my browser or OS, like not even close, and I don’t do anything to obfuscate that, so it’s probably accidentally compliant
Happy to answer any technical questions or discuss implementation details.
People in the comment section has noted the site to recognize multiple page visits from them even though this is their first time visiting the site, did you test your service yourself on different browsers / os / devices ?
Perhaps he's posted this here to get some more test data
Why are docs behind a login wall?
Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu sounds lovely! as does firefox, I should check out one of them at least...
thinks i have visited multiple times when i definitely haven't, did you test this on macs?
AI SLOP [ insert image for "Certified AI BULLSH*" ]
Definitely not working at all.
It shows I've visited all around the world, lots of times.
Nope. Just once, and from one location.