I'm really glad that these HNet-inspired approaches are getting traction, I'm a big fan of that paper.
Though I wonder how much of the gains in this case are actually due to 75% extra parameters compared to the baseline, even if the inference FLOPs are matched.
Can't help but see this as a just different twist on parameter use sparsity idea leveraged by MoE models, as those also gain in performance at constant forward pass FLOPs because of extra parameters.
Would this enable a model to learn concepts in one language and generate answers about it in another, as long as it learns general translations between them?
My educated guess:
Not more than any other LLM.
The text-latent encoder and latent-text decoder just find am more efficient representation of the tokens, but it's more of a compression instead of turning words/sentences into abstract concepts.
There will be residuals of the input language be in there.
I'm really glad that these HNet-inspired approaches are getting traction, I'm a big fan of that paper.
Though I wonder how much of the gains in this case are actually due to 75% extra parameters compared to the baseline, even if the inference FLOPs are matched.
Can't help but see this as a just different twist on parameter use sparsity idea leveraged by MoE models, as those also gain in performance at constant forward pass FLOPs because of extra parameters.
Would this enable a model to learn concepts in one language and generate answers about it in another, as long as it learns general translations between them?
My educated guess: Not more than any other LLM. The text-latent encoder and latent-text decoder just find am more efficient representation of the tokens, but it's more of a compression instead of turning words/sentences into abstract concepts. There will be residuals of the input language be in there.
Broken citations. My inner reviewer gets sad. :(