Fair point, and I appreciate the check.
My intent wasn't to treat this as a pure sales channel, but to get feedback on the framework itself. I'm trying to map Control Theory to psychology (specifically Ashby's Law), and I know this community is the best place to find holes in that kind of logic.
That is why I made the first chapter (which defines the core Topology and math) free/open without an email gate. I am genuinely more interested in the critique of the model than the sales.
I am not sure its "not allowed". The abstract is interesting and thought provoking.
I would love to read the book but I personally don't have time for it - so most likely would not pay for it.
There is a danger in thinking of our "meat machines" in purely mechanical terms - so my first interest is whether whatever model being proposed can actually be adhered to. Or maybe an "AI Copilot" can implement such a framework and assist us mere humans in attaining our goals.
You hit the exact tension I struggled with while writing this.
To give a bit of context: growing up in Poland, I found that without formalizing my goals, I was paralyzed. I literally couldn't "think" clearly about my future because the variables were too undefined. I wrote this book primarily as my own "antifragility toolbox"—using the language I speak best (math and systems) to debug my own life constraints.
Re: The AI Copilot — that is exactly the dream. A dashboard that monitors inputs/outputs and warns: "Variance Instability Detected" before the biological system actually crashes. I am actually prototyping a small Python script for this right now. If it works, I'll post it here.
Interesting, but this is an ad for an ebook and thus is not allowed.
Fair point, and I appreciate the check. My intent wasn't to treat this as a pure sales channel, but to get feedback on the framework itself. I'm trying to map Control Theory to psychology (specifically Ashby's Law), and I know this community is the best place to find holes in that kind of logic. That is why I made the first chapter (which defines the core Topology and math) free/open without an email gate. I am genuinely more interested in the critique of the model than the sales.
I am not sure its "not allowed". The abstract is interesting and thought provoking.
I would love to read the book but I personally don't have time for it - so most likely would not pay for it.
There is a danger in thinking of our "meat machines" in purely mechanical terms - so my first interest is whether whatever model being proposed can actually be adhered to. Or maybe an "AI Copilot" can implement such a framework and assist us mere humans in attaining our goals.
You hit the exact tension I struggled with while writing this. To give a bit of context: growing up in Poland, I found that without formalizing my goals, I was paralyzed. I literally couldn't "think" clearly about my future because the variables were too undefined. I wrote this book primarily as my own "antifragility toolbox"—using the language I speak best (math and systems) to debug my own life constraints. Re: The AI Copilot — that is exactly the dream. A dashboard that monitors inputs/outputs and warns: "Variance Instability Detected" before the biological system actually crashes. I am actually prototyping a small Python script for this right now. If it works, I'll post it here.