because these files contain a lot of arbitrary garbage, including unsent emails
for instance, you will find Stephen Colbert's name in there - because an email sent between two of epstein's buddies included a line where the author thought that epstein would enjoy Colbert's show
so his name is in the files, and he really has nothing to do with it - and I bet there's a lot more, considering the sources of the files
not saying that all the names in that file are innocent - just saying that having your name appear in the file doesn't make you a pedophile - otherwise we should watch out for Forrest Gump and Pikachu too. Their names also appear in the files.
If you are going to redact the name, could you use the same number of letters? eg XXXXp
Given the purpose, I've increased the difference. Apologies if my purpose was not clear.
because these files contain a lot of arbitrary garbage, including unsent emails
for instance, you will find Stephen Colbert's name in there - because an email sent between two of epstein's buddies included a line where the author thought that epstein would enjoy Colbert's show
so his name is in the files, and he really has nothing to do with it - and I bet there's a lot more, considering the sources of the files
I cannot imagine the BBC would bother to disclaim for such cases.
not saying that all the names in that file are innocent - just saying that having your name appear in the file doesn't make you a pedophile - otherwise we should watch out for Forrest Gump and Pikachu too. Their names also appear in the files.
Make you one?! I had no idea current tech was so powerful.
Then again, seeing the latest 3D printers... Who knows what that text in a prompt injection could deliver.
/i