My wife and I have spent the last few years building the Native of Nowhere universe, and as we hit the 300,000-word mark, we realized the industry was hitting a breaking point.
We’re seeing a flood of 'AI Slop' in digital stores, but as an indie team, the pressure to 'scale' is real. This post is our manifesto on why we’ve chosen to 'air-gap' our creative process. While we use a private RAG system as a 'Lore Auditor' (essentially a linter for our world-bible to catch logic and physics errors), we’ve banned generative AI from the prose itself.
We believe that in 2026, the 'human soul' of a story isn't just a philosophical choice—it’s a competitive moat. I’d love to hear how other creators here are balancing technical automation with creative authenticity.
Also, if you'd like to discuss our tech stack on keeping the authenticity alive and immersive, please reach out! There's a lot of Sci that isn't Fi in our system!
Thanks! You caught us—the blog post is definitely more about the 'Why' (the creative philosophy) than the 'How' (the technical implementation).
Here’s the technical side: I've built a private RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system. We've indexed our 'Lucent Universe' world-bible—which includes everything from character timelines to the specific physical laws of Lucarn shapeshifting (conservation of mass, thermal limits, etc.)—into a vector database.
I essentially treat the world-bible as 'Source Truth' and the draft manuscript as 'Code' to be linted. We run an audit script that cross-references new chapters against the index to flag logical breaks—like a character knowing something they haven't learned yet, or a physical impossibility in a shift.
It solves the massive cognitive load of maintaining 300k words of consistency without the machine ever touching the actual prose generation. If there’s interest, I’d be happy to do a deeper write-up on the stack itself!
My wife and I have spent the last few years building the Native of Nowhere universe, and as we hit the 300,000-word mark, we realized the industry was hitting a breaking point.
We’re seeing a flood of 'AI Slop' in digital stores, but as an indie team, the pressure to 'scale' is real. This post is our manifesto on why we’ve chosen to 'air-gap' our creative process. While we use a private RAG system as a 'Lore Auditor' (essentially a linter for our world-bible to catch logic and physics errors), we’ve banned generative AI from the prose itself.
We believe that in 2026, the 'human soul' of a story isn't just a philosophical choice—it’s a competitive moat. I’d love to hear how other creators here are balancing technical automation with creative authenticity.
Also, if you'd like to discuss our tech stack on keeping the authenticity alive and immersive, please reach out! There's a lot of Sci that isn't Fi in our system!
Hey, it's really nice you're supporting your wife like this! But there's nothing about how you're using AI as the "Lore Auditor" in the actual post?
Thanks! You caught us—the blog post is definitely more about the 'Why' (the creative philosophy) than the 'How' (the technical implementation).
Here’s the technical side: I've built a private RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system. We've indexed our 'Lucent Universe' world-bible—which includes everything from character timelines to the specific physical laws of Lucarn shapeshifting (conservation of mass, thermal limits, etc.)—into a vector database.
I essentially treat the world-bible as 'Source Truth' and the draft manuscript as 'Code' to be linted. We run an audit script that cross-references new chapters against the index to flag logical breaks—like a character knowing something they haven't learned yet, or a physical impossibility in a shift.
It solves the massive cognitive load of maintaining 300k words of consistency without the machine ever touching the actual prose generation. If there’s interest, I’d be happy to do a deeper write-up on the stack itself!