10 points | by devnewsletter 2 hours ago ago
10 comments
Just give me the prompt, I'll seek the information by myself.
This is a pretty painful AI read, also thanks for reminding me about all the trauma this past year.
Is it okay to flag low quality ai content like this?
I doubt it's AI generated. It would have been better if it was. But yes, flag away.
There might be some good info in there, but the format/structure is very sloppy.
It feels like someone asked an AI to read a year of output from a ruby link roundup newsletter and then had it write a report: many facts, minimal synthesis, and little-to-no useful opinion/summary.
I sometimes throw an AI at summarizing/extracting, but this one doesn't even merit that effort.
It didn't look like something AI would write to me. I ran it through various AI checkers and they all reported "not AI generated" or "very likely".
Frankly, I wish it had been, it would've been more readable with some bullet points.
Just give me the prompt, I'll seek the information by myself.
This is a pretty painful AI read, also thanks for reminding me about all the trauma this past year.
Is it okay to flag low quality ai content like this?
I doubt it's AI generated. It would have been better if it was. But yes, flag away.
There might be some good info in there, but the format/structure is very sloppy.
It feels like someone asked an AI to read a year of output from a ruby link roundup newsletter and then had it write a report: many facts, minimal synthesis, and little-to-no useful opinion/summary.
I sometimes throw an AI at summarizing/extracting, but this one doesn't even merit that effort.
It didn't look like something AI would write to me. I ran it through various AI checkers and they all reported "not AI generated" or "very likely".
Frankly, I wish it had been, it would've been more readable with some bullet points.