I built Axiomo because every AI code review tool I tried kept solving the wrong problem. They all want to be a second developer on your PR, catching lint issues and suggesting refactors. That's not what makes review hard.
What makes it hard is context. Who wrote this, have they worked in this area before, what are they actually trying to do, and where should I focus?
Axiomo generates a structured Signal for every PR that answers those questions. Contributor context, intent, risk drivers, CI evidence, focus files.
No auto-generated code suggestions. No comment spam. Just the stuff that helps you actually review instead of skim and approve.
Stack is Next.js on Vercel, Neon for Postgres, Resend for email. GitHub integration. Would love feedback on the approach and what your review workflow looks like.
I built Axiomo because every AI code review tool I tried kept solving the wrong problem. They all want to be a second developer on your PR, catching lint issues and suggesting refactors. That's not what makes review hard.
What makes it hard is context. Who wrote this, have they worked in this area before, what are they actually trying to do, and where should I focus?
Axiomo generates a structured Signal for every PR that answers those questions. Contributor context, intent, risk drivers, CI evidence, focus files. No auto-generated code suggestions. No comment spam. Just the stuff that helps you actually review instead of skim and approve.
Stack is Next.js on Vercel, Neon for Postgres, Resend for email. GitHub integration. Would love feedback on the approach and what your review workflow looks like.