I wish someone could help me understand why GenZ predominantly doesn't get this after they keep getting burned by get rich quick schemes. How did we raise a generation of rubes?
It’s rational if you cognize that being the beneficiary of a long shot scheme or gamble is the only viable path to economic security for most, given the overall trajectory of the economy. Simply plot the median wage in terms of gold or any other hard commodity (as opposed to the gamed CPI metric).
Distrust of mianstream media and institutions and high trust in streamers, youtubers and podcasters who aren't regulated by the FCC or any sort of editorial guidelines and happily parrot conspiracies, fringe economic theories, pump shitcoins, promote BetterHelp "therapy" and random dropship brand supplements.
I guess compared to slot machines or lottery tickets (which are instant loss if not a win) if you lose initially on memecoin there is a shred of a chance it rebounds and you can make some of it back.
Maybe they see this as a "better" vice to have with excess income.
It's probably difficult to find out (but someone here could probably analyze the blockchain), but it would be interesting to know the mean and median stake of the investors who got wiped out.
If the mean is large, it's mostly an off-the-books bribery scheme. If the average stake is small, it's mostly a pump-and-dump con of regular people.
But it was probably just a gambling scheme with just one big bet, where as ever, the house always wins.
It can be both. Use the "Contributions" from "Donors" to make it appear that the coin is going to the moon and then dump it once enough credulous victims buy into the scam. Reward the donors with their appropriate tit-for-tat and then pocket it all.
> It can be both. Use the "Contributions" from "Donors" to make it appear that the coin is going to the moon and then dump it once enough credulous victims buy into the scam.
Sure, and cynically, just like in traditional casino gambling, the wipe-out could be viewed as the price of "entertainment".
If there is no class action lawsuit, then we know that the people who got wiped out thought the price was worth whatever they got for it, whether favors or fun.
In the US, laws were only for the affluent, male, white class anyways. Richard Rothstein wrote a great book about it called "Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America"
That's what I thought as well at first, but I've come to think that is just the cover story. While some of his base likely did buy in, I expect that _most_ of the inflows were from individuals or groups looking to influence the administration (aka bribes).
Yet he didn't feel the need to hide the plane he received from the Saudis, or the gold bars he got from tech companies. Hell, he even bragged about those. Because there's no one able and willing to stop his naked corruption, he has zero reason to hide it. Shamelessness is his signature, after all. No, his coins were organically fed by people who believe his lies.
He doesn't have any shame, but some of the people bribing him may not want to be so public about that. His bribecoins gave them the ability to funnel money without having to worry about any fallout (legal or reputational).
I agree with your sentiment but I no longer think empathy is a good long term plan.
One of my favorite books is Excellent Cadavers. It's about two judges in Sicily who systematically rooted out the Mafia. And were both assassinated for their work.
The moral is: action is necessary. Trump is hoping we all stop at trying to find empathy for his team.
> Trump is hoping we all stop at trying to find empathy for his team.
I'm not talking about his team, I'm talking about the people who voted for him.
For instance, he wouldn't have even got off the ground if free trade hadn't decimated the US manufacturing sector. I won't fault anyone with a blue-collar job for voting for him, because the choice was him vs. some neoliberal. When the choices are bad, I understand making a desperate move.
And now we have even worse polarization, which fuels his type even more. More and deeper polarized "action" (like the snide remark I responded to upthread) is not the way to make things better.
> For instance, he wouldn't have even got off the ground if free trade hadn't decimated the US manufacturing sector. I won't fault anyone with a blue-collar job for voting for him, because the choice was him vs. some neoliberal.
And I would agree with you for the 2016 election. However, when Trump lost more manufacturing jobs under his first term than were lost under Obama despite all his bluster about saving and restoring said jobs, and his administration's only legislative win was a big tax cut for the wealthy, it's no longer a valid reason to vote for the guy in 2020 or 2024.
And, the joke's on any who did vote for him a second and third time: he's lost even more manufacturing jobs.
The tragedy is if you look at the actual data, manufacturing jobs generally recover under Democrat administrations, and they tend to be lost in significant numbers under Republican administrations. People are more easily swayed by memes and sound bites than actual data, though.
Empathy is deserved. I have none for the lunatics that defended the recent ICE murders or still try to deny Trump's pedophila. If these people finally realize how garbage their views are, maybe we could think about forgiveness and empathy. Until then, disenfranchisement is the most efficient strategy.
> The difference here is that this is the president doing this rug pull.
Cryptocurrency has always been a scam of no real utility for honest actors (compared to alternatives).
> Using his power to make billions is not exactly enshrined in the constitution.
Not exactly. Trump is dishonest and greedy, and doesn't care about a lot of appearances that prior presidents cared a lot about. In this case, he's not "using his power to make billions," he's actually not refraining from making billions because he has power.
I'm pretty sure Obama and Biden could have made money from a meme-coin, if they were so inclined. But if they even thought about it at all, they would have rejected the idea because it would look bad, hurt the office, etc. Trump doesn't care about those things.
Surely you're taking the piss and can recognize that what's unique about this story is the fact that a sitting US president pushed the meme coins? They made Jimmy Carter put his peanut farm into a blind trust, but Trump is raking in money off his crypto pushes, shady dealings, and business holdings.
Edit: Carter put his farm into a blind trust, he didn't sell it.
That is nothing! Did you know that Obama wore a tan suit one day as the US president? That's the real scandal!
Don't forget about his latte!
Memecoins? More like bribe/money laundering special vehicles
Isn't all memecoin just a pump and dump anyways?
I always thought of it as an alternative to lottery tickets or slot machines.
I wish someone could help me understand why GenZ predominantly doesn't get this after they keep getting burned by get rich quick schemes. How did we raise a generation of rubes?
It’s rational if you cognize that being the beneficiary of a long shot scheme or gamble is the only viable path to economic security for most, given the overall trajectory of the economy. Simply plot the median wage in terms of gold or any other hard commodity (as opposed to the gamed CPI metric).
Distrust of mianstream media and institutions and high trust in streamers, youtubers and podcasters who aren't regulated by the FCC or any sort of editorial guidelines and happily parrot conspiracies, fringe economic theories, pump shitcoins, promote BetterHelp "therapy" and random dropship brand supplements.
I guess compared to slot machines or lottery tickets (which are instant loss if not a win) if you lose initially on memecoin there is a shred of a chance it rebounds and you can make some of it back.
Maybe they see this as a "better" vice to have with excess income.
I dont know, I thought no child was supposed to be left behind
More an alternative to pigeon drop and spanish prisoner
"Crypto president my ass."
I don't know, it seems like this is exactly crypto.
It's probably difficult to find out (but someone here could probably analyze the blockchain), but it would be interesting to know the mean and median stake of the investors who got wiped out.
If the mean is large, it's mostly an off-the-books bribery scheme. If the average stake is small, it's mostly a pump-and-dump con of regular people.
But it was probably just a gambling scheme with just one big bet, where as ever, the house always wins.
It can be both. Use the "Contributions" from "Donors" to make it appear that the coin is going to the moon and then dump it once enough credulous victims buy into the scam. Reward the donors with their appropriate tit-for-tat and then pocket it all.
> It can be both. Use the "Contributions" from "Donors" to make it appear that the coin is going to the moon and then dump it once enough credulous victims buy into the scam.
Sure, and cynically, just like in traditional casino gambling, the wipe-out could be viewed as the price of "entertainment".
If there is no class action lawsuit, then we know that the people who got wiped out thought the price was worth whatever they got for it, whether favors or fun.
It's probably just too early for the class actions. There are a couple suits against Bannon and Trump for the "Let's go Brandon" coin.
It was nice having laws while they lasted.
In the US, laws were only for the affluent, male, white class anyways. Richard Rothstein wrote a great book about it called "Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Color_of_Law
It's just that the middle class is no longer going to be the "In" group.
Oh come on. Yeah the law has never been applied equally. Terribly so. M
That has nothing to do with the specific thing I’m obviously saying.
The unspecified, specific thing.
"Wiped out" - that money went somewhere..
Mission accomplished
https://archive.today/G02Gy
He mostly stole it from his idiotic voter base, so it's a net positive in my book.
That's what I thought as well at first, but I've come to think that is just the cover story. While some of his base likely did buy in, I expect that _most_ of the inflows were from individuals or groups looking to influence the administration (aka bribes).
Yet he didn't feel the need to hide the plane he received from the Saudis, or the gold bars he got from tech companies. Hell, he even bragged about those. Because there's no one able and willing to stop his naked corruption, he has zero reason to hide it. Shamelessness is his signature, after all. No, his coins were organically fed by people who believe his lies.
He doesn't have any shame, but some of the people bribing him may not want to be so public about that. His bribecoins gave them the ability to funnel money without having to worry about any fallout (legal or reputational).
> He mostly stole it from his idiotic voter base, so it's a net positive in my book.
Some of it was done to receive bribes in exchange of favors from the govt. We all paid for that shit.
> He mostly stole it from his idiotic voter base, so it's a net positive in my book.
Have some empathy. With your attitude, we'll have many more Trumps to come.
I agree with your sentiment but I no longer think empathy is a good long term plan.
One of my favorite books is Excellent Cadavers. It's about two judges in Sicily who systematically rooted out the Mafia. And were both assassinated for their work.
The moral is: action is necessary. Trump is hoping we all stop at trying to find empathy for his team.
> Trump is hoping we all stop at trying to find empathy for his team.
I'm not talking about his team, I'm talking about the people who voted for him.
For instance, he wouldn't have even got off the ground if free trade hadn't decimated the US manufacturing sector. I won't fault anyone with a blue-collar job for voting for him, because the choice was him vs. some neoliberal. When the choices are bad, I understand making a desperate move.
And now we have even worse polarization, which fuels his type even more. More and deeper polarized "action" (like the snide remark I responded to upthread) is not the way to make things better.
That's a good point. I totally agree.
> For instance, he wouldn't have even got off the ground if free trade hadn't decimated the US manufacturing sector. I won't fault anyone with a blue-collar job for voting for him, because the choice was him vs. some neoliberal.
And I would agree with you for the 2016 election. However, when Trump lost more manufacturing jobs under his first term than were lost under Obama despite all his bluster about saving and restoring said jobs, and his administration's only legislative win was a big tax cut for the wealthy, it's no longer a valid reason to vote for the guy in 2020 or 2024.
And, the joke's on any who did vote for him a second and third time: he's lost even more manufacturing jobs.
The tragedy is if you look at the actual data, manufacturing jobs generally recover under Democrat administrations, and they tend to be lost in significant numbers under Republican administrations. People are more easily swayed by memes and sound bites than actual data, though.
See: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/manemp
Empathy is deserved. I have none for the lunatics that defended the recent ICE murders or still try to deny Trump's pedophila. If these people finally realize how garbage their views are, maybe we could think about forgiveness and empathy. Until then, disenfranchisement is the most efficient strategy.
No one will tell me who this is about. The title doesn't say. But I bet it was Biden!
Help, I'm being heavily down voted by the Biden team!
[dead]
[dead]
Being upset that meme coins underwent a boom and bust is like getting angry at fire for being hot.
Jimmy Carter put his peanut farm in a blind trust.
The problem with this statement is the part of the title that it completely ignores. More precisely, the first part.
The difference here is that this is the president doing this rug pull.
Using his power to make billions is not exactly enshrined in the constitution.
This is who he is. This is who they voted for. The electorate voted for Congressional representation that does not hold him accountable.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpose_of_a_system_is_wha...
> The difference here is that this is the president doing this rug pull.
Cryptocurrency has always been a scam of no real utility for honest actors (compared to alternatives).
> Using his power to make billions is not exactly enshrined in the constitution.
Not exactly. Trump is dishonest and greedy, and doesn't care about a lot of appearances that prior presidents cared a lot about. In this case, he's not "using his power to make billions," he's actually not refraining from making billions because he has power.
I'm pretty sure Obama and Biden could have made money from a meme-coin, if they were so inclined. But if they even thought about it at all, they would have rejected the idea because it would look bad, hurt the office, etc. Trump doesn't care about those things.
Again, completely irrelevant.
Surely you're taking the piss and can recognize that what's unique about this story is the fact that a sitting US president pushed the meme coins? They made Jimmy Carter put his peanut farm into a blind trust, but Trump is raking in money off his crypto pushes, shady dealings, and business holdings.
Edit: Carter put his farm into a blind trust, he didn't sell it.
It's very obvious that the anger is about POTUS using his office for rug-pulls, not that rug-pulls are happening in the first place
Por que no los dos?
I can be angry about memecoin rug-pulls as a general scam, and I can be angry that the sitting US president is running shady scams.
That’s what we’re upset about ay?