Not sure why people haven't figured it out - bad news is only happening if it is reported. So if you could simply stop reporting the bad news, then they wouldn't be happening. Seems pretty obvious to me.
It's similar to testing in software development. The more tests you have, the more the tests can break. Therefore the ideal number of tests is zero - no tests, no red builds.
Not sure why people can't get with the program here.
"Instead of signing the new policy, the Times journalists — along with dozens of reporters from other outlets — turned in their press passes, opting to cover the military from outside the complex. The Pentagon later welcomed a reconstituted press corps consisting of pro-Trump commentators and influencers."
What’s the diff with the new text? Only the word “solicitation” removed?
Not sure why people haven't figured it out - bad news is only happening if it is reported. So if you could simply stop reporting the bad news, then they wouldn't be happening. Seems pretty obvious to me.
It's similar to testing in software development. The more tests you have, the more the tests can break. Therefore the ideal number of tests is zero - no tests, no red builds.
Not sure why people can't get with the program here.
Reminds me of - Stop the testing to reduce Covid cases.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/23/trump-joking-slowin...
I remember thinking this was ridiculous when he said it. It's wild how it ended up being the ultimate approach.
"Instead of signing the new policy, the Times journalists — along with dozens of reporters from other outlets — turned in their press passes, opting to cover the military from outside the complex. The Pentagon later welcomed a reconstituted press corps consisting of pro-Trump commentators and influencers."
----------
Limit badspeak. Boost goodspeak.
In the same vein as, "it's the police who create crime."
They literally do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqwJFuntco4
Yep. Same reason going to the doctor is fatal. A cancer diagnosis is terrifying and correlates to dying of cancer. Why would anyone take the risk?
Crime, fraud, bribery, assaults, supreme court tampering, supreme court buy outs, government waste, the list is long for the program at hand.
Just for context: the first policy was so bad that even Fox News wouldn’t go along with it.
Well it was nice to have at least some military actions that didn't leak ahead of time.
Reference? Or maybe expand on it a bit?
https://archive.is/JOlEv
I hadn't realized the Times isn't going along with the DoD "de-brand". On this occasion, I will hand it to them.