AI-generated content should have the same amount of copyright as prompt texts. You can't claim copyright for the text "Rock music with angry vocals and 160 bpm with a guitar solo".
But I think training models using copyrighted content is stealing in the first place. It's not fair use, so it should be banned entirely.
"Plaintiff Stephen Thaler had appealed to the justices after lower courts upheld a U.S. Copyright Office decision that the AI-crafted visual art at issue in the case was ineligible for copyright protection because it did not have a human creator."
AI-generated content should have the same amount of copyright as prompt texts. You can't claim copyright for the text "Rock music with angry vocals and 160 bpm with a guitar solo".
But I think training models using copyrighted content is stealing in the first place. It's not fair use, so it should be banned entirely.
> AI-generated content should have the same amount of copyright as prompt texts.
That's about right currently.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-de...
"Plaintiff Stephen Thaler had appealed to the justices after lower courts upheld a U.S. Copyright Office decision that the AI-crafted visual art at issue in the case was ineligible for copyright protection because it did not have a human creator."
YouTube is not an innocent party in this new fraudulent ecosystem. It was literally built on piracy.
https://xcancel.com/i/status/2040577536136974444