Any bets on how long it'll take for a security breach, now that every attacker knows affirm is vibe coding 60% of PRs?
I feel like these top down mandates miss the forest through the trees -- in isolation claude code is a speedup, like how sometimes WD40 is the right tool for the job. But when applying it to everything, you end up with a sticky mess.
The funny part is that I never heard a professional tell me I should use WD40 for a specific task. It's been developed for (W)ater (D)isplacement, it's really good for that; and it's passable at other tasks too. For DIYers, it's fine.
For professional use-cases, targeted products are preferred, whether they be lubricants, penetrating oils, rust remover, etc.
I'm also waiting with bated breath for "How Affirm Retooled its C-Level for Agentic Decision Making and Execution in One Week", and the follow-up headlines from that. Any time now.
> We move money, so mistakes are costly and quality is contractually non-negotiable. We build on a twelve-year-old monorepo with structural bottlenecks: bloated test suites, manual code review, unstable CI, and deploy infrastructure not made for the pace we need.
In my experience, each single item on this list already is a major hurdle for AI agents. The unholy union of all of them together is something I couldn't personally be responsible for - period.
Working on that codebase - I'm sure - is already difficult and often frustrating. Having a horde of short-term-memory-only agents without any real institutional knowledge is a recipe for disaster. I'm sure the rollout looks great on paper, and long-term effects are - conveniently - not the scope of this article.
having tried to wrangle this on my own over months and still seeing gaps everyday i have to raise severe skepticism on this lol.
you mandate and "solve" this in a few weeks over 1:N channels and measure on a metric that nobody even fully understands yet = someone getting paid to bullshit some metrics on agentic productivity to executives. i agree with other posters, 12 months until a dumpster fire of shit reveals itself.
FWIW, i think it is the future but not in the way that'd described here.
I’m in the cutting edge of agentic dev at my company, but there’s no way they could have rolled this out in a meaningful way in two weeks. I can barely get a repeatable process, let alone one that I can actually teach everyone else.
“Decide upfront” is a load of crap. I can write the “perfect” spec plan, but we always, always miss something or misunderstand something. Agents will follow a high confidence spec blindly because they think it’s the blessed pattern.
To me, it sure looks like they took a “best practice”, stuck it in the flow chart then demand everyone use it.
I see zero details about how they actually learned what their devs need, how they know devs are getting value out of this, and what problems devs are trying to solve with agentic tooling.
I am confused why you would write a public article about it as a financial company. But I have many things I am confused about here; I cannot really figure what they do that requires 800 people or how 130m tx/y is anything to boast about in itself. But maybe it is fantastic; I don't know.
Having integrated LLMs into middleware systems handling financial data, I think the skepticism here is warranted but the direction is right. The real challenge isn't the agents writing code; it is the context window around financial logic, compliance boundaries, and legacy system quirks that live in engineers' heads, not documentation.
What works: starting with isolated internal tools where mistakes are recoverable, not customer-facing payment flows. Agents excel at boilerplate and test generation but need human guardrails for business logic. Affirm's one-week timeline sounds more like executive theater than genuine transformation. The 12-month check will be more telling than the announcement.
Any bets on how long it'll take for a security breach, now that every attacker knows affirm is vibe coding 60% of PRs?
I feel like these top down mandates miss the forest through the trees -- in isolation claude code is a speedup, like how sometimes WD40 is the right tool for the job. But when applying it to everything, you end up with a sticky mess.
The funny part is that I never heard a professional tell me I should use WD40 for a specific task. It's been developed for (W)ater (D)isplacement, it's really good for that; and it's passable at other tasks too. For DIYers, it's fine.
For professional use-cases, targeted products are preferred, whether they be lubricants, penetrating oils, rust remover, etc.
Headline soon: Affirm lays off 799 software developers
Headline later: Affirm data breach exposes personal details and bank information of millions of users
I'm also waiting with bated breath for "How Affirm Retooled its C-Level for Agentic Decision Making and Execution in One Week", and the follow-up headlines from that. Any time now.
> We move money, so mistakes are costly and quality is contractually non-negotiable. We build on a twelve-year-old monorepo with structural bottlenecks: bloated test suites, manual code review, unstable CI, and deploy infrastructure not made for the pace we need.
In my experience, each single item on this list already is a major hurdle for AI agents. The unholy union of all of them together is something I couldn't personally be responsible for - period.
Working on that codebase - I'm sure - is already difficult and often frustrating. Having a horde of short-term-memory-only agents without any real institutional knowledge is a recipe for disaster. I'm sure the rollout looks great on paper, and long-term effects are - conveniently - not the scope of this article.
Nice, this reminds me of how I do this in my spare time. My current employer is still figuring out how they want to do AI coding.
Good thing that didn't require two weeks, as that is about 14 attention spans.
having tried to wrangle this on my own over months and still seeing gaps everyday i have to raise severe skepticism on this lol.
you mandate and "solve" this in a few weeks over 1:N channels and measure on a metric that nobody even fully understands yet = someone getting paid to bullshit some metrics on agentic productivity to executives. i agree with other posters, 12 months until a dumpster fire of shit reveals itself.
FWIW, i think it is the future but not in the way that'd described here.
I’m in the cutting edge of agentic dev at my company, but there’s no way they could have rolled this out in a meaningful way in two weeks. I can barely get a repeatable process, let alone one that I can actually teach everyone else.
“Decide upfront” is a load of crap. I can write the “perfect” spec plan, but we always, always miss something or misunderstand something. Agents will follow a high confidence spec blindly because they think it’s the blessed pattern.
To me, it sure looks like they took a “best practice”, stuck it in the flow chart then demand everyone use it.
I see zero details about how they actually learned what their devs need, how they know devs are getting value out of this, and what problems devs are trying to solve with agentic tooling.
Affirm is on its way out anyway, so really this is one last Hail Mary to try to prop up the company, they don’t have much left to lose.
Do I have to read the article before calling it bs?
I am confused why you would write a public article about it as a financial company. But I have many things I am confused about here; I cannot really figure what they do that requires 800 people or how 130m tx/y is anything to boast about in itself. But maybe it is fantastic; I don't know.
Having integrated LLMs into middleware systems handling financial data, I think the skepticism here is warranted but the direction is right. The real challenge isn't the agents writing code; it is the context window around financial logic, compliance boundaries, and legacy system quirks that live in engineers' heads, not documentation.
What works: starting with isolated internal tools where mistakes are recoverable, not customer-facing payment flows. Agents excel at boilerplate and test generation but need human guardrails for business logic. Affirm's one-week timeline sounds more like executive theater than genuine transformation. The 12-month check will be more telling than the announcement.
Are these guys public? Can I short them? Oh, even easier maybe just wager on Kalshi?
They raised about a billion in their IPO. They're listed on the Nasdaq [0].
0: https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/afrm