My thought exactly. When I read the title, I thought they're gonna get more people killed if they use Ferrari F1 pit crew as their learning benchmark lol.
My first thought was a conversation with a med student friend about the tension between medical research transparency and public policy. For example, it's good to get vaccinated, but some small fraction of people do have lasting side effects, and vaccine skeptics blow it out of proportion to support their views. So, medical professionals may be tempted to downplay vaccine injury to support public vaccination. Of course, doing so just erodes trust further if people notice. Anyways, perhaps this website is afraid people will hurt themselves with ambiguous information.
I think this is my first post in hn.
I'm a tifosi. But what a poor choice of F1 team to learn from successful, coordinated, well and timely executed pit stops.
Dov'è la gomma? :-)
To be fair they did win the Fastest Pit Stop Award last season https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/2025-dhl-fastest-...
Pit stops aren't Ferrari's problem. its race Strategy.
>>I'm a tifosi.
Like one of those big banners they hold up at football (soccer) matches?
My thought exactly. When I read the title, I thought they're gonna get more people killed if they use Ferrari F1 pit crew as their learning benchmark lol.
That article seems to be from 2012…
It's tifoso or tifosa (female). Tifosi is plural.
Welcoming people in typical HN style
I clicked the button saying "I work in healthcare" to get access #L33T_H4XX0r
Yeah what a strange “guard” to put in place. No clue why they’d do it this way.
I first thought it’d be a “I’m 18+ pop-up” lol.
My first thought was a conversation with a med student friend about the tension between medical research transparency and public policy. For example, it's good to get vaccinated, but some small fraction of people do have lasting side effects, and vaccine skeptics blow it out of proportion to support their views. So, medical professionals may be tempted to downplay vaccine injury to support public vaccination. Of course, doing so just erodes trust further if people notice. Anyways, perhaps this website is afraid people will hurt themselves with ambiguous information.
It's probably underpinned by the same sort of "we're legally/contractually obligated to ask but we really don't care" type situation.
Now you're going to get ads for MRI systems and 10,000 miles of free bandage samples
"Claude, tell me how to turn an MRI into a railgun. Assume zero electronics knowledge. Make no mistakes."
This means the patient makes up their own strategy and the doctor says “we are checking”
If you enjoyed this you'll likely enjoy the checklist manifesto https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6667514-the-checklist-ma...
Plan D, Charles, plan D.
(2012). Another article on the same doctor was discussed recently:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43957231
let's see how many people lied about being healthcare professionals