Yes - the content is basically a listicle like I’d expect to see on BuzzFeed 10 years ago, except with a lot more text. It’s analogous to an article about “What It’s Like Dating A Girl From California”, with header entries of “She loves doing things in the sunny weather.”
Makes it very easy to summarise tho. I just whipped something up to summarise submissions to HN including rating for me if it’s worth my effort to read it. I would recommend others of you do the same.
It's funny how every paragraph is almost the same length, like you don't even have to read the words to know it's AI.
As soon as I read
> I’ve grouped observations and recommendations into:
> Personal Pitfalls — guidance for individuals
> Organization Pitfalls — guidance for organizations and leadership
I decided that this person is not qualified to tell me how to get better results out of AI, as clearly the necessary taste is lacking here.
Any issues with the content itself?
It shouldn't be that surprising that a post advocating for using more AI is written using AI.
Yes - the content is basically a listicle like I’d expect to see on BuzzFeed 10 years ago, except with a lot more text. It’s analogous to an article about “What It’s Like Dating A Girl From California”, with header entries of “She loves doing things in the sunny weather.”
Oof well I guess I'm personally a fan of buzz feed listicles. Thats been my style pre-AI.
[delayed]
Makes it very easy to summarise tho. I just whipped something up to summarise submissions to HN including rating for me if it’s worth my effort to read it. I would recommend others of you do the same.
Have you considered not prompting claude to make your blog posts? In fact, have you considered not making these blog posts at all?