While (presumably) no money was exchanged, Apple and OpenAI entered a contractual agreement, and apparently OpenAI believes that Apple hasn’t met its contractual obligations.
I can only see the first couple of paragraphs, but it's OpenAI following in the footsteps of every other company that doesn't have a viable product: litigation.
I lol’d at this because I also didn’t pay for access. But… aren’t we all just hypocrites and kind of jerks that give even a few dollars to people out there doing reporting and providing us with information?
If I’m reading this correctly, OpenAI is upset because Apple hasn’t made their features visible enough yet.
Which seems like a bonkers reason to try and sue, and one which could backfire spectacularly on them, if Apple sends people into court to testify under oath that OpenAI’s features didn’t ship because they didn’t meet quality bars.
(Also, between this and the “please try Enterprise Codex, we’ll give you two months of free credits” announcement from a couple days ago, there’s a real whiff of desperation coming from OpenAI lately. They must really be feeling the heat from Anthropic)
The article makes it sound like OpenAI is really entitled in this one. Also legal action is obviously going to be a strong signal of OpenAI's friendliness /s.
https://archive.is/Ingcu
What fight? OpenAI is getting nothing from Apple just like Bloomberg is not getting any money for me to read their article.
While (presumably) no money was exchanged, Apple and OpenAI entered a contractual agreement, and apparently OpenAI believes that Apple hasn’t met its contractual obligations.
I can only see the first couple of paragraphs, but it's OpenAI following in the footsteps of every other company that doesn't have a viable product: litigation.
I lol’d at this because I also didn’t pay for access. But… aren’t we all just hypocrites and kind of jerks that give even a few dollars to people out there doing reporting and providing us with information?
It sounds like Apple is re-learning the lesson that relying on a 3rd party can be a liability.
Pretty sure Apple can survive a legal war like this. On the other hand, it sounds like OpenAI is punching above its weight.
If I’m reading this correctly, OpenAI is upset because Apple hasn’t made their features visible enough yet.
Which seems like a bonkers reason to try and sue, and one which could backfire spectacularly on them, if Apple sends people into court to testify under oath that OpenAI’s features didn’t ship because they didn’t meet quality bars.
(Also, between this and the “please try Enterprise Codex, we’ll give you two months of free credits” announcement from a couple days ago, there’s a real whiff of desperation coming from OpenAI lately. They must really be feeling the heat from Anthropic)
I think they're feeling the heat from their promised IPO and having to file a S1.
Pretty much this is the reason.
Our country can't make good movies or TV anymore so bring on the courthouse drama
The article makes it sound like OpenAI is really entitled in this one. Also legal action is obviously going to be a strong signal of OpenAI's friendliness /s.