A very strange project. I can see the reasoning to get something familiarly premium from a cheap source, but surely in any developed country your only ever starting point should be tap water. Water that has been bottled months ago and been in (usually plastic) bottles for months can never be better than your local aquifer even if the source is harder. Gets more difficult of course if you are in a big city and your main source is recycled water from the local facility, but even then a little osmosis machine or simple filter will give you a better water than any Don Perrignon or Evian.
Yeah... especially since the source isn't really cheap either. Also, I have never understood how it can possibly make sense to ship water from Fiji to the US, or even from France or Italy to Germany. Local mineral waters may not have as much prestige, but they taste just as good. Actually, that would be a better project: compare the mineral composition of mineral waters to check which local mineral water best matches the taste of an imported brand.
It's because restaurants make the most money on drinks, so selling you overpriced water with artificial branding becomes an excuse to charge the same money for water as one would for sodas.
And some cannot be convinced that tap water could be safe to drink. I know a few people who exclusively drink glass-bottled water, because they fear microplastics on top of that.
"A little osmosis machine"... Where do I find these? Would it fit in my appartement? Can I install it without plumbing if I am only a renter? How often do I need to clean it? How often do I need to change the filter? How many kW and how many liters of wasted water do I need to spend to get half a liter of osmosed water?
Your recommendation may be valid for large volumes long term (like the aquarium or brewing at craft beer scale), but for all the other uses not.
You can get no install ones that go on your counter or light install ones you connect under your sink (no more difficult than installing a bidet in your apartment). Cost wise they are cheap enough they pay for themselves (including filters) vs even cheap bottled water over the course of a year (well, if you only drink 1 bottle per week or something the economics will be different - 2 bottles per day should ~break even). ~3 filters per year, depends on the model and usage.
Bottled water is usually just a convenience factor of "I can take x bottles from this pack wherever at once on demand, or even grab them full of water I like while not at home".
It does vary, but as long as the sources stay the same, the composition will also stay within certain limits. For instance, Munich publishes its water composition. The list combines items that you might find on a mineral water label, like calcium and magnesium, with items that you usually won't find there, like lead (don't worry, it's below 0.001 mg/l): https://www.swm.de/dam/doc/wasser/trinkwasser-analysewerte.p...
Interesting! Given the obvious AI-written nature of this, I'd probably want to double-check the math, but it's a neat concept.
As a homebrewer, the standard approach is to look up / measure your tap water's profile, buy a few grams of additives (gypsum, calcium chloride, epsom salt, etc), and add them to compensate. But if you don't have your water profile handy, this could work in a pinch. 5 gallons of bottled water is an expensive approach, though!
For anyone that decides to vibe-code these kind of tools, have a generated content vs. manual labour split.
This isn't bound to AI-use, even if you scrape factual content, a million and one things can go wrong, so having some kind of checkbox that says "Yes, I have reviewed and verified it is one hundred and fifty percent certainly confidently true, a fact even" forces you to verify what you're publishing is true.
I grew up in the Sierras. We got our water from Marlette Lake. It tasted "correct," like that's how water is supposed to taste, and water from anywhere else tasted wrong/gross.
I presume a big contributor to that is familiarity. But still, it makes me curious how that water compares to other sources. I'd be curious to see the water I grew up with broken down on a site like this.
I make my own mineral water - it's surprisingly straightforward. Make a concentrate of whatever you like, add a bit of it into a carbonation bottle, carbonate it, shake, refrigerate, and either consume sparkling or let it offgas.
You have to carbonate because (at least in my case) the amount of minerals per liter is too much for them to dissolve on their own, but they generally stay in suspension even when degassed
Oh great. After never fully grasping tasting notes of food, coffee, wines … now water.
Jokes aside this is seriously impressive and makes me want to try and see if I can register them as unique enough. I certainly can taste different water bottle brands difference, but going from that to saying what’s good for x recipe is pretty next level
It's a thing, just a very niche thing. There are fancy walter filtration systems that put minerals back so it's more controlled. I suppose this is useful when you're living in America, where everything is chlorined to death.
You clearly haven't tasted coffee or tea brewed with hard water. And I don't see why yeast or fish wouldn't be more comfortable in some range of mineral composition than another.
A very strange project. I can see the reasoning to get something familiarly premium from a cheap source, but surely in any developed country your only ever starting point should be tap water. Water that has been bottled months ago and been in (usually plastic) bottles for months can never be better than your local aquifer even if the source is harder. Gets more difficult of course if you are in a big city and your main source is recycled water from the local facility, but even then a little osmosis machine or simple filter will give you a better water than any Don Perrignon or Evian.
Yeah... especially since the source isn't really cheap either. Also, I have never understood how it can possibly make sense to ship water from Fiji to the US, or even from France or Italy to Germany. Local mineral waters may not have as much prestige, but they taste just as good. Actually, that would be a better project: compare the mineral composition of mineral waters to check which local mineral water best matches the taste of an imported brand.
It's because restaurants make the most money on drinks, so selling you overpriced water with artificial branding becomes an excuse to charge the same money for water as one would for sodas.
And some cannot be convinced that tap water could be safe to drink. I know a few people who exclusively drink glass-bottled water, because they fear microplastics on top of that.
"A little osmosis machine"... Where do I find these? Would it fit in my appartement? Can I install it without plumbing if I am only a renter? How often do I need to clean it? How often do I need to change the filter? How many kW and how many liters of wasted water do I need to spend to get half a liter of osmosed water?
Your recommendation may be valid for large volumes long term (like the aquarium or brewing at craft beer scale), but for all the other uses not.
You can get no install ones that go on your counter or light install ones you connect under your sink (no more difficult than installing a bidet in your apartment). Cost wise they are cheap enough they pay for themselves (including filters) vs even cheap bottled water over the course of a year (well, if you only drink 1 bottle per week or something the economics will be different - 2 bottles per day should ~break even). ~3 filters per year, depends on the model and usage.
Bottled water is usually just a convenience factor of "I can take x bottles from this pack wherever at once on demand, or even grab them full of water I like while not at home".
> can never be better than your local aquifer
lol getting that fresh water
also bottles have the mineral composition labeled, varies for tap water
It does vary, but as long as the sources stay the same, the composition will also stay within certain limits. For instance, Munich publishes its water composition. The list combines items that you might find on a mineral water label, like calcium and magnesium, with items that you usually won't find there, like lead (don't worry, it's below 0.001 mg/l): https://www.swm.de/dam/doc/wasser/trinkwasser-analysewerte.p...
Interesting! Given the obvious AI-written nature of this, I'd probably want to double-check the math, but it's a neat concept.
As a homebrewer, the standard approach is to look up / measure your tap water's profile, buy a few grams of additives (gypsum, calcium chloride, epsom salt, etc), and add them to compensate. But if you don't have your water profile handy, this could work in a pinch. 5 gallons of bottled water is an expensive approach, though!
For anyone that decides to vibe-code these kind of tools, have a generated content vs. manual labour split.
This isn't bound to AI-use, even if you scrape factual content, a million and one things can go wrong, so having some kind of checkbox that says "Yes, I have reviewed and verified it is one hundred and fifty percent certainly confidently true, a fact even" forces you to verify what you're publishing is true.
A POC is only 10% of the way.
Ok, so:
"""You’re not fighting the water or compensating for it; you’re working with a clean, neutral base that lets the coffee do the talking."""
The author is I think letting something else than coffee do the talking here. Have a brew maybe?
Are you complaining it looks AI?
It might be, but it's also a sentence I might have read on any "choosing water for coffee" article of the last twenty years.
I was complaining about stilted prose, and indeed a few years back I would just have let it slide. But now it grates more I guess.
The (old) foodblog Khymos has an excel sheet to calculate what salts to add to get different mineral waters starting from the known composition of your own tap water: https://khymos.org/2012/01/04/mineral-waters-a-la-carte/
Trying it out is still on my list; it's not easy to get food-grade necessary salts...
I grew up in the Sierras. We got our water from Marlette Lake. It tasted "correct," like that's how water is supposed to taste, and water from anywhere else tasted wrong/gross.
I presume a big contributor to that is familiarity. But still, it makes me curious how that water compares to other sources. I'd be curious to see the water I grew up with broken down on a site like this.
I make my own mineral water - it's surprisingly straightforward. Make a concentrate of whatever you like, add a bit of it into a carbonation bottle, carbonate it, shake, refrigerate, and either consume sparkling or let it offgas.
You have to carbonate because (at least in my case) the amount of minerals per liter is too much for them to dissolve on their own, but they generally stay in suspension even when degassed
Care to share some ratios? Where you get the minerals from? Electrolite mix? Won't it explode everywhere if you shake after carbonation?
Water for pizza crust would also be a good category.
I drink DI RO water <1 ppm TDS.
Oh great. After never fully grasping tasting notes of food, coffee, wines … now water.
Jokes aside this is seriously impressive and makes me want to try and see if I can register them as unique enough. I certainly can taste different water bottle brands difference, but going from that to saying what’s good for x recipe is pretty next level
I’m calling BS on this. Biggish claims that are so vague as to be borderline unverifiable, no scientific basis laid out.
https://www.wikihow.com/Make-Mineral-Water
It's a thing, just a very niche thing. There are fancy walter filtration systems that put minerals back so it's more controlled. I suppose this is useful when you're living in America, where everything is chlorined to death.
The whole thing is slop.
Why x Matters: is absolutely a tell
You clearly haven't tasted coffee or tea brewed with hard water. And I don't see why yeast or fish wouldn't be more comfortable in some range of mineral composition than another.