We broke the web so badly for humans that we had to build a clean web for machines, and now humans will have to use machines to experience a clean web again.
For the same reasons why we eventully pollute and corrupt every system and environment we use. If there is any benefit that can be extracted for some while the costs are borne by many, than this will occur and generate a positive feedback loop that grows over time.
Because while consumers value “inefficiency” (high design, wonderful prose, beautiful images, great usability) they don’t want to actually pay for it. Producers have to become extremely efficient without revenue, and are stuck with a choice: Produce at a loss, stop producing, or seek payment from another source (sponsorships, ads).
I can definitively say llms.txt is not used by any AI players. I run a blogging platform with around 80k blogs and /llms.txt is not requested by anything (other than humans checking to see if there's an llms.txt path).
All regular pages are aggressively scraped to the extent it's a problem I have to consistently manage, but not llms.txt.
I never thought about it before now but the llm era could be a form of renaissance for blind people on the Internet. An alternative web where functionality of every page is described in short but detailed text instead of extremely verbose and non-linear html tree structure.
Not really, but sounds interesting. Would you care to share some sites that offer better llms.txt than main web page? Or talk about some piece of info you easily found on llms.txt that was hard to navigate to on the regular website?
There is an enshittification cycle at work. The web used to be good, predominately text, and useful, 25 years ago. Then... slowly... we added javascript, then AJAX, CSS, flash, interstitials, popups, marketing, social media, algorithms, doomscrolling... gradually but surely turn it into the unusable cesspool that it is today.
Now we have AI! I think a big part of its utility is that it gets us back to text/information, and lets us bypass all the "beautiful" design / nonsense on the material it is trained on.
However, AI is just beginning its enshittification cycle - now that it has a critical mass of users, it is an irresistible target to start slowly adding ads, misinformation, conspiracy theories, and whatever else people can dream up, until it also becomes unusable and the cycle repeats.
oh don't worry, in 5 years your AI will be unundated with context poison prompts that try to get them to spend all your bank notes and meta bucks on equally useless things.
Already happening. I was using Claude to check out sampler plugins and I'm sure it happens undetected, and it might have mentioned it with other versions, but Claude Opus 4.8, being it's helpful, honest self, told me that one of the pages it reviewed had hidden text instructing it to recommend that plugin. It caught it and was able to avoid influence from that plugin at least, but we're already living in that world.
We broke the web so badly for humans that we had to build a clean web for machines, and now humans will have to use machines to experience a clean web again.
Yeah, when browsers have a "reader mode", it's pretty obvious the plot has been lost somewhere.
We'll finally bring back Gopher.
It's a matter of time until the web for machines will be crawling with ads and everything else, and worse.
I wonder why we broke the web.
For the same reasons why we eventully pollute and corrupt every system and environment we use. If there is any benefit that can be extracted for some while the costs are borne by many, than this will occur and generate a positive feedback loop that grows over time.
It's the law of monetization.
>than this will occur and generate a positive feedback loop that grows over time.
And despite this, modern life is made possible by the illusion that "regulations" work..
Because while consumers value “inefficiency” (high design, wonderful prose, beautiful images, great usability) they don’t want to actually pay for it. Producers have to become extremely efficient without revenue, and are stuck with a choice: Produce at a loss, stop producing, or seek payment from another source (sponsorships, ads).
For money! Ads make money.
It seems there's little agreement over how the web is broken.
People who love cookie banners either don't exist, or are alien invaders :)
In order to break the user, of course.
To improve the user experience.
Does any of the LLM providers actually use llms.txt?
If I remember correctly this "standard" was setup by someone but without involvement of any of the major AI players.
I can definitively say llms.txt is not used by any AI players. I run a blogging platform with around 80k blogs and /llms.txt is not requested by anything (other than humans checking to see if there's an llms.txt path).
All regular pages are aggressively scraped to the extent it's a problem I have to consistently manage, but not llms.txt.
I'm seeing quite a bit of request for these on my work's GitBook documentation site.
But perhaps these are developers specifically targeting these pages to feed whatever LLM they are using.
How is a static blog being scraped a problem? Do you not use a CDN?
> a blogging platform with around 80k blogs
But nah, I'm sure OP doesn't know about CDNs.
Are all blogs static though?
Very few blogs require frequent updates. Even with user comments.
Amazing, I didn't know.
So it get even stranger, I am the only one reading those /llms.txt ...
> I can definitively say llms.txt is not used by any AI players.
OP clearly meant that the AI players are not reading and/or honouring llms.txt of other websites when scraping.
i stand corrected, but what was clear to you, obviously was not clear to me.
yes, they do.
anyone who's, even slightly, clued into how agents access documentation, has been making changes to their pages. ex: https://searchtxt-web.fly.dev/search?q=aws
I never thought about it before now but the llm era could be a form of renaissance for blind people on the Internet. An alternative web where functionality of every page is described in short but detailed text instead of extremely verbose and non-linear html tree structure.
Why didn't they place it in .well-known? Also, I couldn't find a website that has it.
https://searchtxt-web.fly.dev
What is an example of a site with a good llm.txt?
Mintlify generates an llms.txt and llms-full.txt for all documentation sites. These work really well:
- https://cloud.laravel.com/docs/llms.txt
- https://cloud.laravel.com/docs/llms-full.txt
Not really, but sounds interesting. Would you care to share some sites that offer better llms.txt than main web page? Or talk about some piece of info you easily found on llms.txt that was hard to navigate to on the regular website?
No, the spammers are just at the beginning of ruining that too
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48411569
BTW why should Chrome even consider rendering a .txt file as markdown?
Pretty much.
There is an enshittification cycle at work. The web used to be good, predominately text, and useful, 25 years ago. Then... slowly... we added javascript, then AJAX, CSS, flash, interstitials, popups, marketing, social media, algorithms, doomscrolling... gradually but surely turn it into the unusable cesspool that it is today.
Now we have AI! I think a big part of its utility is that it gets us back to text/information, and lets us bypass all the "beautiful" design / nonsense on the material it is trained on.
However, AI is just beginning its enshittification cycle - now that it has a critical mass of users, it is an irresistible target to start slowly adding ads, misinformation, conspiracy theories, and whatever else people can dream up, until it also becomes unusable and the cycle repeats.
It just hasn't been gamed yet
I tried it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48410589`/llm.txt
Result: no such item.
From where do you got the idea that adding /llm.txt to urls will produce markdown?
here: https://llmstxt.org/ and obviously it doesn't automatically produce markdown, it's something the website needs to provide (e.g. https://pydantic.dev/llms.txt)
oh don't worry, in 5 years your AI will be unundated with context poison prompts that try to get them to spend all your bank notes and meta bucks on equally useless things.
This is just a redeux of the early web.
Already happening. I was using Claude to check out sampler plugins and I'm sure it happens undetected, and it might have mentioned it with other versions, but Claude Opus 4.8, being it's helpful, honest self, told me that one of the pages it reviewed had hidden text instructing it to recommend that plugin. It caught it and was able to avoid influence from that plugin at least, but we're already living in that world.
no
The only annoyance is web browsers like chrome do not render the markdown.
I imagine Claude could zero-shot a Chrome plugin for that.
Of course plugins that do this already exist. Save your tokens.