I recently set up GoModel and there's now way I'm going back to a world without it. Gateways are great for local too! I can swap out models or quants and my tools do not need to be reconfigured.
At the enterprise level, you need to be resilient to provoder downtime and gateways can handle this org wide.
This is why I use databricks. I don't give a damn about which model wins. I use whichever. I can compare them easily in the playground and govern them through unity AI gateway. If one model starts sucking, I swap it out.
You could say the same thing about AWS, GCP, OpenRouter etc. etc.
Databricks is near the bottom of the list that anyone who knows what they're doing would want to choose. It pivots every time there's a new technology and isn't really ever any good at any of them.
The CEO has a bunch of AI papers. Seems like a smart guy, but I don’t know why he’s using the Mozilla brand or platform to screw around with AI stuff. Maybe because Mozilla makes no money and they’re hoping to jump on the AI bandwagon? I don’t know, doesn’t seem like it will end well..
Well I think it is the platform layer. If you can blow up $1m on a harness sure… otherwise rent it.
Agreed with much of this. Models are commodities. LLM gateways are the correct enterprise pattern imo.
I recently set up GoModel and there's now way I'm going back to a world without it. Gateways are great for local too! I can swap out models or quants and my tools do not need to be reconfigured.
At the enterprise level, you need to be resilient to provoder downtime and gateways can handle this org wide.
Will organizations want to control their own proxy or use OpenRouter?
This is why I use databricks. I don't give a damn about which model wins. I use whichever. I can compare them easily in the playground and govern them through unity AI gateway. If one model starts sucking, I swap it out.
It would more honest to disclose you work for Databricks
You could say the same thing about AWS, GCP, OpenRouter etc. etc.
Databricks is near the bottom of the list that anyone who knows what they're doing would want to choose. It pivots every time there's a new technology and isn't really ever any good at any of them.
It's nice to be rich.
The CEO has a bunch of AI papers. Seems like a smart guy, but I don’t know why he’s using the Mozilla brand or platform to screw around with AI stuff. Maybe because Mozilla makes no money and they’re hoping to jump on the AI bandwagon? I don’t know, doesn’t seem like it will end well..
> Maybe because Mozilla makes no money
Mozilla makes a surprising amount of money, almost entirely from google.
> Maybe because Mozilla makes no money
Something like $680 million annual revenue. There are thousands of companies in Silicon Valley that would kill for that.
Egads surely Mozilla can produce a blog post that isn't written in AI-speak?