Great, the start of model segmentation where I'm gonna need a legal license to ask about legal problems, a nutritionist license to create a meal plan, a medical license to ask about an x-ray, a pilots license to ask about a flight plan, be a registered electrician to ask how to wire something, etc etc. The licensing of allowed thoughts.
Apparently I can pay for partial solutions to the Riemann hypothesis but if my question involves a crackme or something that is an existential risk somehow.
Have you thought for a single moment that this could save our profession? If people need a software development license to use AI for software development we wouldn't loose our jobs just like lawyers or doctors won't?
From my perspective what I always loved about "the profession" was a relative LACK of gatekeeping. I loved offensive security for the same reason, there was a long run where you really just needed to be able to hack, and if you could demonstrate that there was a job for you somewhere (for better or worse).
From my perspective keeping the industry in its current form frozen in amber would be as weird as, I don't know, kept the horse / buggy / carriage industry in business.
How much will a license cost? Can it be earned? If granted, granted by whom? Can I use it across models? Does it need to be reassessed regularly? How often?
If any of the above are more convenient than paying an engineer you aren’t any safer, the enterprise paying is just putting money in someone else’s pocket.
Furthermore everybody should need a license from the government or industry to cook morning breakfast on the stove. Fire hazards and all. Could do real harm if something went wrong.
These “safeguards” aren’t guarding anything tho, just yesterday I was pentesting something and 5.6 sol initially said that it can’t do xyz, I added 2 words at the end and it proceeded like it was nothing, follow up prompts I didn’t even add anything it just assumed and carried on normally.
What exactly is so fascinating? I would rather take Kimi K3 any day rather than go through this “Oracle Inc” like process and have it all recorded by OpenAI.
I understand that “normal” people are let’s say “less concerned” about posting everything on something like Facebook but I expect more from OPSec people.
> We couldn't start verification. You may not be eligible for this verification flow right now. Please try again later, or contact support if you think this is a mistake.
> POST /backend-api/compliance/cyber_verification/persona/inquiries
> 403 cyber_verification_precheck_failed
All I did was open and close the Persona tab.
Even Anthropic accepted me into their cyber program.
The requirement for hardware security keys ties the use of these models even tighter to a specific identity.
This will limit ability to scale or share the model.
Great, the start of model segmentation where I'm gonna need a legal license to ask about legal problems, a nutritionist license to create a meal plan, a medical license to ask about an x-ray, a pilots license to ask about a flight plan, be a registered electrician to ask how to wire something, etc etc. The licensing of allowed thoughts.
Apparently I can pay for partial solutions to the Riemann hypothesis but if my question involves a crackme or something that is an existential risk somehow.
Have you thought for a single moment that this could save our profession? If people need a software development license to use AI for software development we wouldn't loose our jobs just like lawyers or doctors won't?
From my perspective what I always loved about "the profession" was a relative LACK of gatekeeping. I loved offensive security for the same reason, there was a long run where you really just needed to be able to hack, and if you could demonstrate that there was a job for you somewhere (for better or worse).
From my perspective keeping the industry in its current form frozen in amber would be as weird as, I don't know, kept the horse / buggy / carriage industry in business.
> just like lawyers or doctors won't
Pretty big assumption.
How much will a license cost? Can it be earned? If granted, granted by whom? Can I use it across models? Does it need to be reassessed regularly? How often?
If any of the above are more convenient than paying an engineer you aren’t any safer, the enterprise paying is just putting money in someone else’s pocket.
Furthermore everybody should need a license from the government or industry to cook morning breakfast on the stove. Fire hazards and all. Could do real harm if something went wrong.
You do need a license to sell food in most countries.
https://lifearchitect.ai/models-table/
These “safeguards” aren’t guarding anything tho, just yesterday I was pentesting something and 5.6 sol initially said that it can’t do xyz, I added 2 words at the end and it proceeded like it was nothing, follow up prompts I didn’t even add anything it just assumed and carried on normally.
The constant interruptions and "can't show this content" are extremely annoying though.
how did this not reach the front page? this is fascinating.
What exactly is so fascinating? I would rather take Kimi K3 any day rather than go through this “Oracle Inc” like process and have it all recorded by OpenAI.
I understand that “normal” people are let’s say “less concerned” about posting everything on something like Facebook but I expect more from OPSec people.
How do Kimi K3 subscriptions compare to OpenAI's in terms of price and usage?
> We couldn't start verification. You may not be eligible for this verification flow right now. Please try again later, or contact support if you think this is a mistake.
> POST /backend-api/compliance/cyber_verification/persona/inquiries
> 403 cyber_verification_precheck_failed
All I did was open and close the Persona tab.
Even Anthropic accepted me into their cyber program.