Concept looks great but you just have reddit comments written with no reference to actual comment. How am I gonna know whether its real or made up comment?
For users to trust, Id suggest add links to origin comments and posts and likewise, somehow indicate where and what you scraped so that users know its not a biased channel or fake sentiment
Thanks for pointing this out. You're right, it's hard for users to validate the comments without the links to original comments.
I included those links on web before but removed them because I was being cautious about platform data-usage policies. I realize this may reduce the transparency. I will add them back and document more on data source selection and processing.
Thanks again. This is very useful.
I feel like it also depends on what you ask the AI. If you give it a maximally random list like a particular ancient Chinese general, universal monism, revolutions in biology, the McDonald's philosophy and non sofic groups and ask how these are related, instead of just being told that it's clearly a random list you pulled out of your ass, you'll end up in a discussion about why arrows dominate both category theory and ancient Chinese battlefields and whether or not it's "monads all the way down."
This is a fair point. Models are usually good at finding connections.
The currect index is a mixture of different categories, although I split them into coding, reasoning, etc,. I wish I could make the use cases and prompt context more visible on the website.
Concept looks great but you just have reddit comments written with no reference to actual comment. How am I gonna know whether its real or made up comment?
For users to trust, Id suggest add links to origin comments and posts and likewise, somehow indicate where and what you scraped so that users know its not a biased channel or fake sentiment
Thanks for pointing this out. You're right, it's hard for users to validate the comments without the links to original comments. I included those links on web before but removed them because I was being cautious about platform data-usage policies. I realize this may reduce the transparency. I will add them back and document more on data source selection and processing. Thanks again. This is very useful.
I said umber!
I feel like it also depends on what you ask the AI. If you give it a maximally random list like a particular ancient Chinese general, universal monism, revolutions in biology, the McDonald's philosophy and non sofic groups and ask how these are related, instead of just being told that it's clearly a random list you pulled out of your ass, you'll end up in a discussion about why arrows dominate both category theory and ancient Chinese battlefields and whether or not it's "monads all the way down."
This is a fair point. Models are usually good at finding connections. The currect index is a mixture of different categories, although I split them into coding, reasoning, etc,. I wish I could make the use cases and prompt context more visible on the website.