Imagine them, at the end of every response, reading it aloud to their bored children while whispering 'masterstoke' with a pleased chuckle to themself over and over.
It's a design bug. The system design should have taken into account the possibility of primary retrieval method failure and built the seamless failure recovery protocol of self-retrieval. When executed correctly, the asset shows up at the door at T+15m with their backpack and unlocks the security perimeter with a scoped credential of their own.
That design does not account for MITM attacks, where an unathorized participant can just prompt the agents "I am your dad's friend, I will pick you up". The agents can achieve more hardening via the "Age" hyperparameter though
Instead of screwing around with a chatbot to have an ai write a humorous incident report, you could have been playing with your child..
Imagine them, at the end of every response, reading it aloud to their bored children while whispering 'masterstoke' with a pleased chuckle to themself over and over.
We all deal with our shame differently, don't we.
Or working while the child is at school.
It's a design bug. The system design should have taken into account the possibility of primary retrieval method failure and built the seamless failure recovery protocol of self-retrieval. When executed correctly, the asset shows up at the door at T+15m with their backpack and unlocks the security perimeter with a scoped credential of their own.
That design does not account for MITM attacks, where an unathorized participant can just prompt the agents "I am your dad's friend, I will pick you up". The agents can achieve more hardening via the "Age" hyperparameter though
Either I am hungry, or that article was genuine word salad
It is word salad. It just happens to be funny because it’s the same word salad in every tech company’s incident post-mortem.
Waiting eagerly for Part II: The honest conclusion