Are you guys really letting a (as of now) non FOSS, presumably vibecoded app have access to your servers, presumably as root, as most people don't follow best practices?
Most people already run software like that on their computer, even if it's just your coding harness that could just as easily run ssh and use your keys in ~/.ssh to connect to your servers. In my case I'd get a permission prompt from 1Password as I have my keys in there, but with all the prompts that a modern macOS throws at you the chances of it getting approved mistakenly are not zero.
Anyone who gives an LLM unfettered access to their ssh keys/agent socket deserves what they get IMO. I sandbox Claude with my own bubblewrap-based script which denies it access to anything I deem unnecessary.
There's many ways to shoot yourself into the foot, most things that run in your userspace can do evil things and it's not an LLM exclusive feature. Any npm package you install on your machine can put you in danger already if it executes some scripts.
Looks like TRUENAS if it was single-prompted. Also how will it know what my server runs if I install nothing on it? will my server just expose all information? I'm a bit confused why this was a design choice.
Every time I connect to my server I receive a Delivery Status Notification (Failure) email from my gmail address as if it tries to use my phpmailer to send an email to testing@example.com
edit: the email comes from my website, when I connect a new user is created in my website with random name and that email address..
The macOS installer is not notarized, and while adding an exception in Gatekeeper exists, not everyone would be willing to do that, especially currently when even the app source is unavailable.
Apple charges $99/year to be able to notarize a app. Plus, it has one years long bug that any random Apple developer account can get stuck in, and then, you just can't get it notarized. Have a look at this thread: https://github.com/electron/notarize/issues/205
I do agree that notarizing it would make installing much easier.
Pretty cool for those who are not running something like TrueNAS/FreeNAS/Proxmox. But then the question is why are you not. Even for MacOS im pretty sure you can glue up a raw bare metal box to Proxmox these days with Proxmox Datacenter Manager
Thank you, I tried it, so far working great. One small thing I hit: when I tried connecting to a server I'd never connected to before, it refused at first with no clear error. I had to SSH in from my terminal once to accept the host key signature, and then it worked fine. Minor, but thought I'd pass it along. Great work!
I do. I love to build things, though these things are not that meaningful yet as I want them to be. Most of these (except last 3 and that 'A calculator CLI...') are being actively used by many.
But I should not have shared a single `show hn` more than once.. that I will take care of going ahead.
Beautiful, I have a fetish for beautiful software so here goes my upvote ^
I believe more Rust/Tauri apps will flood the market as that's the best combo right now for desktop apps in universal knowledge reusability for those who come from the web world HTML, CSS, JS. Simplicity and portablility
Just downloaded it and at 8MB is a thing of joy to see apps small again
Are you guys really letting a (as of now) non FOSS, presumably vibecoded app have access to your servers, presumably as root, as most people don't follow best practices?
The choice of Tauri for a Linux app using AppImage is a dead giveaway they have no clue what they are doing.
Most people already run software like that on their computer, even if it's just your coding harness that could just as easily run ssh and use your keys in ~/.ssh to connect to your servers. In my case I'd get a permission prompt from 1Password as I have my keys in there, but with all the prompts that a modern macOS throws at you the chances of it getting approved mistakenly are not zero.
I'd not run OPs software either though.
Anyone who gives an LLM unfettered access to their ssh keys/agent socket deserves what they get IMO. I sandbox Claude with my own bubblewrap-based script which denies it access to anything I deem unnecessary.
There's many ways to shoot yourself into the foot, most things that run in your userspace can do evil things and it's not an LLM exclusive feature. Any npm package you install on your machine can put you in danger already if it executes some scripts.
I only tested it on WSL locally, there is bo way im connecting it to a live server without seeing the sourcecode.
Absolutely not.
It's from stupidlabs.lol Made for stupid people?
Nope, cfEngine FTW!
Looks like TRUENAS if it was single-prompted. Also how will it know what my server runs if I install nothing on it? will my server just expose all information? I'm a bit confused why this was a design choice.
I just heard of TrueNAS for the first time in my life... So, checked google images.. there is some similarity for sure.
It detects the server OS "after SSH authentication" by running a small POSIX-shell probe.
It will not automatically expose "all information". It can access only what the SSH account can access.
Every time I connect to my server I receive a Delivery Status Notification (Failure) email from my gmail address as if it tries to use my phpmailer to send an email to testing@example.com
edit: the email comes from my website, when I connect a new user is created in my website with random name and that email address..
DOESN’T SEEM SAFE AT ALL!
The macOS installer is not notarized, and while adding an exception in Gatekeeper exists, not everyone would be willing to do that, especially currently when even the app source is unavailable.
Apple charges $99/year to be able to notarize a app. Plus, it has one years long bug that any random Apple developer account can get stuck in, and then, you just can't get it notarized. Have a look at this thread: https://github.com/electron/notarize/issues/205
I do agree that notarizing it would make installing much easier.
Also, source code is coming day after tomorrow.
What's the business model - and what guarantees are provided that Serverbox[0] won't rug pull after a seed round from Dillon-Edwards[1]?
[0]https://stupidlabs.lol
[1]https://clownpenisf.art
No financial incentive in mind or planned... I was building it for myself... then, spent a few days extra polishing it so others can use it as well.
Thanks for the reply, did not expect a response.
The initial inquiry was not in good faith, but a satirical critique of the project domain.
Pretty cool for those who are not running something like TrueNAS/FreeNAS/Proxmox. But then the question is why are you not. Even for MacOS im pretty sure you can glue up a raw bare metal box to Proxmox these days with Proxmox Datacenter Manager
Potentially interesting - of it is at a minimum source-availble - preferably FOSS?
I assume it is vibe-coded, so would need a pretty thorough review before considering using it.
License and source availability not being on the page/faq suggest this is just a hobby project, I guess?
Source code will be released day after tomorrow. I will add a comment in this thread itself, as well as update the site with a link to Github.
This is exactly the gap I needed filled, a proper desktop panel that manages my Linux servers over SSH without installing anything on them.
Is it open source?
Thank you...
Source code will be released day after tomorrow. I will add a comment in this thread itself, as well as update the site with a link to Github.
Thank you, I tried it, so far working great. One small thing I hit: when I tried connecting to a server I'd never connected to before, it refused at first with no clear error. I had to SSH in from my terminal once to accept the host key signature, and then it worked fine. Minor, but thought I'd pass it along. Great work!
Thank you for testing. I'll fix the issue.. tomorrow.. too tired as of now.
Is this shipping wasm openssh or how does it work?
edit: nvm, for some reason I thought it runs in the browser.
It's free but no open-source?
Source code will be released day after tomorrow. I will add a comment in this thread itself, as well as update the site with a link to Github.
I mean yeah sure, I'll give SSH access to a blackbox. "Don't worry — the app is safe."
Source code will be released day after tomorrow. I will add a comment in this thread itself, as well as update the site with a link to Github.
Why not make this post the day after tomorrow then instead of today?
You have a never ending stream of show HN. It becomes meaningless.
Show HN: Linux server management over SSH – written in Rust and Tauri
2 hours
Show HN: The wanderer – cozy weekend game with no objective
14 days
Show HN: Feature-packed 6MB Rust+Tauri free bookmarking app
16 days
Show HN: HN-jobs aggregator – updated in real-time
27 days
Show HN: One no-subscriptions online search for all your agent needs
30 days
Show HN: 100% Free Indian Railways API
35 days
Show HN: Xkcd Search
45 days
Show HN: A calculator CLI to help your agents perform calculations accurately
55 days
Show HN: Hacker-News Jobs
57 days
Show HN: Hacker-News Buddies
58 days
Show HN: HTTPS://HN-Jobs.com
59 days
Show HN: JerrySniffs – MCP Server (and API’s) for web and social media search
75 days
Show HN: Give This Markdown to Your Coding Agent Before Publishing to NPM
3 months
Show HN: Nano-RAG – Agentic multi-hog retrieval without graph database
3 months
Show HN: Chat with UFO Files
3 months
I do. I love to build things, though these things are not that meaningful yet as I want them to be. Most of these (except last 3 and that 'A calculator CLI...') are being actively used by many.
But I should not have shared a single `show hn` more than once.. that I will take care of going ahead.
I think what I have trouble with is the lack of awareness. Anyone and everyone can do this now. It’s great. I do so myself at home, for myself.
But what are you (and millions of others) actually adding here?
So its pretty much abandoneware?
Clearly vibe-coded. Hard pass.
yikes, no thanks.
All of these "written in rust" ai-slop tools lately. Means absolutely nothing, really.
Beautiful, I have a fetish for beautiful software so here goes my upvote ^
I believe more Rust/Tauri apps will flood the market as that's the best combo right now for desktop apps in universal knowledge reusability for those who come from the web world HTML, CSS, JS. Simplicity and portablility
Just downloaded it and at 8MB is a thing of joy to see apps small again
Won't happen until Tauri can treat Linux as a first class platform. Which they cannot do because of architectural design and library choices.