Nothing surprising here. AI is a tool just like an IDE, debugger, etc. All the regular tasks like coding, testing and review still holds true. Developer is still responsible for their work. Reviewer is responsible for ensuring code quality and standards. As long as the submitted code is of high quality and does not violate copyright, AI is not a concern.
It's stupid only when an organization refuses to understand AI is a text prediction software and thinks it can replace humans in coding, testing, reviewing etc.
Nothing surprising here. AI is a tool just like an IDE, debugger, etc. All the regular tasks like coding, testing and review still holds true. Developer is still responsible for their work. Reviewer is responsible for ensuring code quality and standards. As long as the submitted code is of high quality and does not violate copyright, AI is not a concern.
It's stupid only when an organization refuses to understand AI is a text prediction software and thinks it can replace humans in coding, testing, reviewing etc.