While I very much see the problem space you're trying to solve, I also like to flag an inherent problem here:
I don't think process and tooling is really the problem. The disfunctional nature of many companies is mainly caused by misaligned incentives and poor leadership, not due to too many tools and disjointed project management.
Unfortunately, while I think the tool looks great, it won't fix the problem for organisations that have it.
Landing page screams llm-isms, and after reading and looking around, I still can't identify what problems it tries to solve. The features described are just standard integration glue, they have little relevance to context or why's.
Why does it worth investing time into adopting this one instead building an in-house solution tailored to existing process?
What’s the one line pitch? You need to grab attention. What problem(s) are you solving? Not features - problems. You talk about “losing context” - that’s interesting but a little abstract. Unpack it. Imagine you have one sentence to explain to the person whose life you’re about to make better. What sentence will make them pay attention?
Edit: to be fair, “replace your project manager” did make me pay attention, but perhaps what is the sentence after that?
Hmm, the naming wasn't inspired from linear it self actually but its a combination of a name of person i love and my surname (:
about Linear integration, yes i did not integrate it yet
I'm sure you've put time and effort into this, but the companies I work with have all vibe-coded their own ones at this point, so I wonder what the commercial value of shop tools like this is.
I think you need to highlight what value you are bringing to the table that the PMs in my life can't build exactly how they want, or that an open-source version wouldn't be better suited to.
While I very much see the problem space you're trying to solve, I also like to flag an inherent problem here:
I don't think process and tooling is really the problem. The disfunctional nature of many companies is mainly caused by misaligned incentives and poor leadership, not due to too many tools and disjointed project management.
Unfortunately, while I think the tool looks great, it won't fix the problem for organisations that have it.
Landing page screams llm-isms, and after reading and looking around, I still can't identify what problems it tries to solve. The features described are just standard integration glue, they have little relevance to context or why's.
Why does it worth investing time into adopting this one instead building an in-house solution tailored to existing process?
What’s the one line pitch? You need to grab attention. What problem(s) are you solving? Not features - problems. You talk about “losing context” - that’s interesting but a little abstract. Unpack it. Imagine you have one sentence to explain to the person whose life you’re about to make better. What sentence will make them pay attention?
Edit: to be fair, “replace your project manager” did make me pay attention, but perhaps what is the sentence after that?
Neat app, lame post title. This has nothing to do with replacing project managers. IMHO, drop the link bait and let the app speak for itself.
I was surprised to see that you don’t integrate with Linear which I assumed the name was related to.
Hmm, the naming wasn't inspired from linear it self actually but its a combination of a name of person i love and my surname (: about Linear integration, yes i did not integrate it yet
This actually looks very useful, good work
I'm sure you've put time and effort into this, but the companies I work with have all vibe-coded their own ones at this point, so I wonder what the commercial value of shop tools like this is.
I think you need to highlight what value you are bringing to the table that the PMs in my life can't build exactly how they want, or that an open-source version wouldn't be better suited to.