Editorialized title provides vastly more context than the title that was provided by the piece. Breaks the rules, but sometimes the rules are wrong and should be bent.
(“fly.io got breached” for future HN search if title is reverted)
Except it's not correct, they were vulnerable to a kernel CVE that presumably everyone else was also vulnerable to, and there's no indication of a breach
That's not the title (Well, That Wasn't Fun: October 16 '26)
Editorialized title provides vastly more context than the title that was provided by the piece. Breaks the rules, but sometimes the rules are wrong and should be bent.
(“fly.io got breached” for future HN search if title is reverted)
But I’m confused, where is there any evidence of a breach? Seems misleading?
Except it's not correct, they were vulnerable to a kernel CVE that presumably everyone else was also vulnerable to, and there's no indication of a breach